Connect with us

Commentary

LGBTQ Christian Students in Seattle demand change, win hearts for Pride

Student association won’t stand for discrimination- For now students are fighting to get their school back

Published

on

Screenshots of TikTok video by “enGAYge the culture,” an association of Seattle Pacific University students.

By James Finn | DETROIT – 2022 has been a tough year for LGBTQ Pride as political and religious leaders openly push hate and right-wing groups like the Patriot Front and Proud Boys attempt to terrorize Pride events and even small children, like last weekend in Idaho and California’s Bay Area.

But many bright spots dot the headlines! Here’s an inspirational and existentially important story about a dedicated group of students spreading love in the best traditions of Christianity and Pride.

Have you seen those graduating seniors at the private Christian Seattle Pacific University? They went viral handing rainbow Pride flags to their university president instead of shaking his hand, protesting discrimination against their LGBTQ teachers. Their message — that Gen Z Christians aren’t about to tolerate anti-LGBTQ persecution in the name of Jesus— took TikTok and Twitter by storm.

The students’ gesture was brilliant and captured public imagination. Their video, which you can watch in full above, is jaunty, positive, and uplifting. LGBTQ folks all over the world are sending messages of love and thanks. Progressive Christian pastors have praised them in sermons and editorials, and mainstream press gave them a well deserved moment in the sun.

But there’s a lot more going on than you’ll find in that video.

I’ve been following this fascinating story for over a year, and I want tell you why it’s critical to LGBTQ equality, and why it’s existentially important to U.S. Protestant Christianity. Let’s dig under the headlines to look at who and what these kids are fighting for and what their tactics have to say about progress.

Part-time nursing professor refused promotion because he’s gay

The story first blew up in January 2021 when adjunct (part-time) nursing professor Jéaux Rinedahl applied for a full-time teaching opening at the invitation of his Seattle Pacific (SPU) department chair, who said Rinedahl’s 40-year nursing career and excellent rapport with students made him an ideal candidate.

Professor Jéaux Rinedahl, denied promotion by Seattle Pacific University on the grounds he is gay.
Screenshot from KIRO 7 reporting.

Rinedahl, who calls himself a devout, church-going Christian, says he loves teaching and has a “deep and profound respect” for the university’s mission and values.

But then someone in administration learned Rinedahl is gay, probably by spotting his wedding photos online, and SPU denied him the promotion on the grounds that his “lifestyle” contravenes moral guidelines in university employment policies. SPU, however, “repeatedly encouraged” him to stay on part time, according to his attorneys.

He was good enough to work on campus, but not good enough to work fulltime. Students and faculty cried foul at once.

SPU students began protesting as soon as the story broke. Faculty overwhelming supported Rinedahl.

Students, faculty ,and staff members presented a united front, telling reporters they believe SPU’s employment policies are regressive, contrary to the university’s ethos of inclusion, and at odds with its ecumeniucal Christian traditions.

Students held vigils as professors challenged the SPU Board of Trustees to amend “antiquated rules” that didn’t reflect actual practice.

In response, several weeks later, the board issued a statement saying they would not reconsider university employment policies. If they thought their firm response would put the matter to bed, however, they badly miscalculated.

In April of 2021, 72% of SPU faculty voted to express “no confidence” in the board, calling on members to “propose a solution that eliminates the discriminatory hiring policy” and to “re-establish the former practice of having faculty representatives participate in regular board deliberations.” They asked board members who could not fulfill their responsibilities in line with the majority spirit of SPU faculty, staff and students to step down.

That did not happen.

Instead, the board hardened its position, drawing a line in the sand over LGBTQ matters, reflecting a national trend in the conservative Christian world.

This doesn’t sit well with the vast majority of Christians who actually teach and attend classes at SPU, however, who don’t consider themselves conservative Christians, who say they can’t accept practices they find contrary to their Christian beliefs.

So what’s going on? Why is the board digging in its heels?

Nobody is quite sure. While Seattle Pacific is a private Christian university historically tied to the Free Methodists denomination, it is not sectarian in operation. It’s not run as a branch of any Methodist church, and the student body is not predominantly Free Methodist or any kind of Methodist. Nor are they expected to be. Most students describe themselves as Christians, but like many Gen Z Seattle area residents, some do not.

The denomination has no legal authority over the university, and while it has contributed a small sum of money over the past 40 years, the total doesn’t amount to as much as a rounding error in a single annual budget.

Faculty are confused.

Christopher Hanson describes himself to The Guardian “as the only out queer full-time faculty member at the school.” When he interviewed for his position in 2019, he questioned anti-LGBTQ employment policy, but says he was “told not to worry about it because it was merely a historical document.”

Unlike students, SPU faculty members are required to be Christians. A certain amount of church attendance is also required, though professors say nobody has ever monitored that. Very few faculty members attend Free Methodist churches. Particular Christian dogma and denominational statements have not traditionally played a role in the university’s governance or hiring practices.

In short, SPU has operated as a sort of “open tent” for mainstream Protestant Christians. Faculty members tell reporters that a “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” ethos prevailed regarding gender and sexual minorities, and while some of them had been unhappy about feeling unaccepted, they could live with it in the spirit of ecumenical cooperation.

Then Jéaux Rinedahl came along.

The board used his case to batten down the anti-LGBTQ hatches, aligning themselves with conservative elements of the Protestant Christian world that had never been strongly represented on campus.

Can legal action put things right?

Professor Rinedahl sued SPU in state court, settling his case for an undisclosed amount, and then the Religious Exemption Accountability Project (REAPhelped SPU students join a first-of-its-kind lawsuit against the Department of Education’s federal religious exemption to Title IX.

REAP is not expected to prevail in federal court, however, and the Department of Justice shocked LGBTQ advocates in court filing last June saying they would “vigorously” defend the right of religious colleges and universities to discriminate against LGBTQ faculty, staff, and students.

Short of Congress passing the proposed LGBTQ Equality Act, which will not happen anytime soon, the SPU board can, legally, discriminate against LGBTQ people.

SPU students aren’t waiting on the law

Leah Duff, 22, a Christian student from Maryland who came to SPU from an LGBTQ affirming church, puts it this way:

“You’re going to charge me thousands of dollars every quarter to come here and to get an education, but you’re not going to provide me the education that I deserve as a queer person by having queer staff and faculty? You talk about being ecumenical, being so diverse. And it’s like, where is it?”

Duff didn’t know about SPU’s anti-LGBTQ policies when she decided to attend because they weren’t visibly enforced then. She says she feels cheated, and she’s not alone.

She’s joined a group of LGBTQ and allied students holding a sit-in at the university administration complex. They’ve been at it for over 20 days and say they intend to occupy the building throughout the summer and for as long as it takes to get justice.

Students have made a video of the sit-in too, titling it, “That feeling when you’ve been sitting outside your president’s office for 100 HOURS to protest your university’s homophobic policies because you are a bunch of gen z students who won’t take no for an answer.”

Graduate and outgoing SPU student government president Laur Lugos helped organize the sit-in, and she handed Interim President Pete Menjares a handwritten letter at graduation along with her rainbow flag.

She told the Seattle Times she asked him to resign, expressing her dislike of “Christian niceness,” describing it as “superficial kindness” that cannot make up for Christians actively participating in discrimination.

She reminds me of a Mormon teenager who once wrote to tell me she didn’t need Church leaders to “be nice.” She needs them to to be good, to stop excluding her and treating her as second-rate because she’s a lesbian.

Gen Z Christians aren’t cool with lines in sand, and I predict SPU will have to accommodate that

Young Christians today are increasingly uncool with concrete moral judgements about matters theologians and Bible scholars say are not black and white. They say Christians agree to disagree about many matters and that LGBTQ issues are not, or should not be, any different.

Hardcore conservative Christians take a very different viewpoint, seeming to define their Christianity in terms of sexual matters, but Gen Z is fleeing those churches in unprecedented numbers.

SPU’s Christian faculty and (perhaps more critically) its Christian student body clearly don’t buy into the hardline position. So what happens next? This is a question of existential importance to SPU and many other Christian institutions.

If the board maintains its hardcore line, Gen Z Christian students like Leah Duff and Laur Lugos will choose different Christian universities (or secular universities), leaving SPU with a shrinking pool of potential students and likely very little diversity.

SPU faces a choice between accommodating diverse belief or shrinking and perhaps fading away. Much of the conservative Christian world seems faced with the same choice, as leaders draw lines in the sand that baffle their followers, especially younger generations.

For now, SPU students are fighting to get their school back. Reach out on TikTok and send them some love!

************************

James Finn is a columnist for the LA Blade, a former Air Force intelligence analyst, an alumnus of Queer Nation and Act Up NY, and an “agented” but unpublished novelist. Send questions, comments, and story ideas to [email protected]

********************

The preceding article was previously published by Prism & Pen– Amplifying LGBTQ voices through the art of storytelling and is republished by permission.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Commentary

The Right’s targeting LGBTQ liberty- SCOTUS ruling on Roe is a precursor

“We now live in a country where it’s illegal to help a 12-year-old rape victim end her pregnancy. We must reform SCOTUS”

Published

on

Protests outside of the U.S. Supreme Court after Roe v. Wade is overturned June 24, 2022 (Blade photo by Michael Key)

By James Finn | DETROIT – Somewhere in the U.S. this morning, a young girl is pregnant because she was sexually violated by somebody she trusts — a parent, an uncle, a teacher, maybe a Southern Baptist pastor. She’s terrified, believing it’s her own fault. Her mother is doing everything in her power to help, but her position is agonizing.

Because they live in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee or Texas, her 12-year-old daughter cannot legally end her pregnancy — not even as a victim of rape or incest. If they’re poor, traveling out of state for an abortion will be difficult or impossible, especially when abortion is illegal in surrounding states.

In at least two states, that mother could face crippling financial/legal consequences if she takes a bus with her daughter out of state for an abortion, and if one of her neighbors turns them in to authorities.

Welcome to the Republic of Gilead

This is real. This is happening right now, as you read this. For 50 years, women in the U.S. have enjoyed the Constitutional right to end their pregnancies before “viability,” the point when a fetus can survive outside the uterus. This morning, I wake up in a country where a small cabal of religious extremists on the Supreme Court, in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, have overturned Roe v Wade, snatching personal liberty from women and girls.

I wake knowing those justices are gunning for other fundamental privacy rights like contraception, same-sex marriage, and even the right to have consensual sex with other adults.

How did we get to this dark corner of official religious fanaticism?

Katherine Stewart in The Guardian spells out a decades-long process, detailing “how the Christian right took over the judiciary and changed America,” despite representing only a fringe minority of Americans and a fringe minority of legal thinkers.

* If we fail to take the justices at their word about the rest of their extremist agenda, we do so at our peril as a free people. *

A super majority of Americans disagree with the high court, insisting traditional American liberty MUST include women, insisting the justices got it RIGHT 50 years ago when they recognized the Constitution implicitly guarantees to women the right to make their own reproductive choices based on their own values and religious beliefs — or lack of religious beliefs.

A super majority of Americans believe religious Jews, for example, have every bit as much right to act on their consciences, based on their faith traditions, as conservative Christians have. Traditional Jewish ethics require abortion in circumstances where the mother’s well being would be severely impacted by pregnancy — like with that 12-year-old girl above.

The extremist Christian conservatives on the Supreme Court don’t care.

They just said, in effect, we only care about what conservative Christians like us want. Welcome to the Republic of Gilead, where our religious beliefs dictate your lack of liberty.

Religious extremists on the Court take aim at LGBTQ equality

Justice Clarence Thomas isn’t shy in his concurring opinion, writing, “We should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.”

He means such “trivial” rights as using contraception to prevent pregnancy, having sex in private with a same-sex partner, or marrying a same-sex partner. He says the Constitution does not and should not prohibit the State from intruding into those extraordinarily private portions of American lives. Justice Samuel Alito is on the record agreeing with Thomas, although he wrote in yesterday’s majority opinion that Dobbs should not be read to mean an automatic end to other substantive due process rights.

Legal scholars aren’t impressed with that disclaimer, especially given Alito’s prior statements expressing hostility to such rights. They note Justice Amy Coney Barrett is equally hostile to privacy rights. They ask how Dobbs’ reasoning could fail, ultimately, in eviscerating general privacy rights for all Americans.

Writing in the LA Blade, leading LGBTQ activists express alarm over Dobbs’ reasoning, warning that unless we act decisively, we will lose many of our cherished liberty guarantees.

Human Rights Campaign Legal Director Sarah Warbelow writes, “we know that if the Court was willing to overturn 50 years of precedent with this case, that all of our constitutional rights are on the line. Lawmakers will be further emboldened to come after our progress.”

National Minority AIDS Council Executive Director Paul Kawata adds, “Justice Thomas’s chilling concurring opinion makes it very clear that the court could target other rights.”

They’re right. We already know the conservative justices want to end civil equality for LGBTQ Americans. They’ve told us so in blistering language many times. Yesterday, as the justices snatched critical liberty from women and girls, they showed us not even 50 years of entrenched legal precedent will stop them. If we fail to take the justices at their word about the rest of their extremist agenda, we do so at our peril as a free people.

We must protect women and girls

In the short to medium term, working together to help women like that hypothetical 12-year-old rape victim must be a critical priority. The governors of California, Washington, and Oregon have already announced a joint effort to offer safe haven to women and girls, saying they plan to order state law enforcement agencies not to cooperate with out-of-state agencies investigating women or abortion providers.

According to The Atlantic, outraged women are already organizing around activism and safe-haven networking, determined to make abortion available for women and girls who need it.

The federal government has announced steps to make medical abortion (by pill) more accessible, although that’s no panacea. It’s usually illegal for a physician to prescribe medication via telemedicine to a patient in a state where such medication may not be lawfully dispensed.

Our Number One priority must be Supreme Court reform

President Biden called yesterday for a massive turnout at the polls in November to elect a Congress that will pass abortion protection legislation. He’s absolutely right that we need that massive turnout, but he doesn’t go far enough.

No amount of federal legislation will stop Supreme Court religious extremists from defending state abortion bans. Congress, arguably, lacks the authority to tell states how to regulate abortion, and if you think the conservative justices will just let that slide, you aren’t paying attention.

As Stewart explains in The Guardian, the conservative justices hold fringe legal views, so don’t expect them to play by conventional rules. Senators Susan Collins and Joe Manchin learned that the hard way yesterday after Justice Brett Kavanaugh broke what they describe as his personal, private pledge not to overturn Roe.

Only Supreme Court reform will save LGBTQ equality

The extremist religious justices are on a rampage right now, tearing down traditional walls of separation between Church and State, privileging religious instructions that discriminate against LGBTQ people, even ruling last week that Maine has an affirmative legal obligation to fund religious instruction with taxpayer dollars. Legal experts threw their arms up in astonished horror.

None of this is going to go away on its own. The justices aren’t going to magically see the light and stop eviscerating liberty in favor of fringe religious views.

Yes, we need massive voter turnout in November to elect a Congress willing to save American freedom. No, passing a federal abortion law isn’t the answer, or at least not the whole answer.

We must enact fundamental judicial reform

We must expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court and give President Bident the opportunity to appoint mainstream legal thinkers who will put the religious extremists dominating the court today in a minority.

That’s perhaps a radical idea, but it’s no more radical today than when FDR did the same thing in 1937 when faced with a judiciary implacably opposed to his efforts to rescue the U.S. from the Great Depression — implacably opposed to the will of the American people and mainstream legal thinking.

The only thing more radical than taming the court would be not taming it, allowing the Republic of Gilead to emerge from the pages of dystopian fiction into cruel reality.

Doubt me? Go talk to that 12-year-old rape victim and her mother who can’t find a way to save her daughter.

In the meantime, act, organize, get out the vote. Our most cherished American liberties depends on massive turnout in November.

Get out there and make it happen!

************************

James Finn is a columnist for the LA Blade, a former Air Force intelligence analyst, an alumnus of Queer Nation and Act Up NY, and an “agented” but unpublished novelist. Send questions, comments, and story ideas to [email protected]

********************

The preceding article was previously published by Prism & Pen– Amplifying LGBTQ voices through the art of storytelling and is republished by permission.

Continue Reading

Commentary

Cops help masked Proud Boys terrorize kids at NC Pride event

Multiple library patrons report on Facebook that they felt threatened and terrorized by the masked Proud Boys and by the deputies

Published

on

Facebook photos taken by a witness to the incident

WILMINGTON- According to patrons at a Pride story event in the Pine Valley branch of the New Hanover, North Carolina library system, a group of 15 masked men terrorized them yesterday with the active assistance of sheriff’s deputies, forcing families with children as young as 17 months old to flee through a side door, and preventing the library from being used for its ordinary purpose for as long as 90 minutes..

Bring out the drag queens!

According to local news reports, deputies responded to a demonstration at the Pine Valley library where a group of four parents brought a reported six children under seven years old to listen to library staff stories about diverse families.

Then, according to parents and witnesses, all hell broke loose.

They say the families and other library patrons were terrorized by a group of “Cape Fear Proud Boys” who deputies escorted from the parking lot into the library and up to the door of the reading room. Multiple witnesses report that the demonstrators shouted obscenities through the door and screamed, “Bring out the drag queens! Bring out the drag queens!”

Library staff say the event did not include drag queens.

Library patrons on Facebook report that deputies fist bumped the protestors and engaged in casual banter with them while they created a disturbance that ended the reading and forced librarians to hustle the parents and children out through a side door for their safety.

Sheriff’s office denies allegations of unprofessional conduct and dereliction of duty. Eyewitnesses say the sheriff is lying.

According to a statement the New Hanover County Sheriff’s Office posted on Facebook, nothing happened at all. The sheriff posted that the Pride event was completely orderly and that he fulfilled his oath of office:

A Sheriff’s Office supervisor entered the library and positioned himself between the private room holding the reading and the demonstrators. The supervisor instructed the demonstrators that they were not allowed to enter the room. At no time did Sheriff Deputies witness nor did any library staff report any of the demonstrators causing a disturbance within the library or try to enter the private room that was holding the reading. After the reading, all the participants left the library with no incident.

Multiple witnesses agree that statement is false, claiming deputies let the protesters scream through the door and did not try to stop them from disturbing the peaceful use of the library or from terrorizing the families and the performer inside the reading room.

Angie Smith Kahney posted that she saw, “the [New Hanover County Sheriff’s Office] escort the Proud Boys and their klan into the building straight to the room where children as young as 1 were with their parents, while they shouted obscenities and threats.” She adds that the protestors “taunted parents and children” inside and outside the library after the event was over, while still being escorted by deputies who did not act to protect the public.

* The children aren’t driving themselves to the library. Parents have the right to choose what they teach their children. *

Sandra Dawn posted that she “watched these protestors SCREAM at young children and their families as they exited the building. The sheriffs allowed these people to stand within feet of young children and SCREAM at them.”

She asks, “Why on earth did the sheriffs allow these protestors to stand within feet of the doorways and go inside the building and stand outside of the room where the event was held? Why did the sheriffs not require these people to keep their distance?”

Witness Amy Holland says of the Sheriff’s Office statement: ‘This is a lie. At no time did deputies place themselves “between the room and protestors.”

Screenshot of Facebook eyewitness statement

One mother tells reporters she felt blindsided

Emily Jones tells Star News that she took her 17-month-old daughter to the Pride event because she thought a library would be safe and peaceful. “I felt like this story time was really one of the safest places I could take my daughter for a Pride event. I just felt like it’s the library, it’s probably pretty low-risk.”

She says she felt nervous when she saw demonstrators gathered in the parking lot holding signs saying “LGBT is grooming our kids” and “the library is responsible for child abuse.” She added that she wished parents would have been notified prior to the event that safety was a concern.

She did not say what she thought about deputies escorting protestors to the door of the room she was in with her toddler or what she thought about deputies letting those protestors scream obscenities and threats through the door.

Community members express support for the Proud Boys

While community reaction to the Sheriff’s Facebook statement is largely skeptical, some local residents are expressing solidarity with the Proud Boys.

Kevin Rigsbee writes, “Biggest question…. Why was there a “pride story time” for young children? These are kids…. They don’t need this logic shoved down their throats too!”

Pamela Eaton writes, “Sad Childrens minds are innocent! They don’t need to hear this garbage!”

Bruce True writes, “ Public library means open to the public. NO PRIVATE ROOMS ! NO DOUBT THEY WERE INDOCTRINATING LITTLE KIDS”

Those statements and others like them are getting pushback, well represented by Alyssa Rangel, who writes, “The children aren’t driving themselves to the library. Parents have the right to choose what they teach their children. If you don’t want your children to be read pride books, stay home… These beautiful families were just trying to enjoy their day.”

LGBTQ families deserve protection and support from law enforcement

New Hanover County residents have been commenting on Facebook and Twitter that the Cape Fear Proud Boys have been disrupting local school board meetings for months and that the Sheriff’s Office appears to give them wide latitude to bully and harass citizens, often tolerating what appear to be blatant violations of “orderly meetings” and “disturbing the peace” laws. Locals observe that deputies appear to be overly friendly with the Proud Boys, often bantering and laughing with them instead of enforcing the law.

Locals say they believe the Sheriff’s Office is actively biased against LGBTQ people and did not stop the Proud Boys from disrupting the Pride event yesterday because deputies approve of what the Proud Boys were doing. They say that among other things, the fist bumps between some of the deputies and the Proud Boys clearly signal the deputies’ support for the Proud Boys, an avowed white supremacist organization whose leadership is under federal indictment for seditious conspiracy in the January 6 attack in the U.S. Capitol.

Besides open racism against Black people and Jews, the Proud Boys oppose equality for transgender and gay people. Proud Boy members terrorized a different Drag Queen Story Hour event on June 11 at the San Lorenzo Library in Alameda County, California.

At least in Alameda County, the Sheriff’s Office is investigating and has pledged to crack down on the group and work to stop future harassment. New Hanover County residents say that their sheriff’s “There’s nothing to see here, move along” attitude shows them they can’t rely on law enforcement for protection, especially if they’re LGBTQ, Black, or members of other groups the Proud Boys don’t like.

LGBTQ people in North Carolina deserve the active cooperation of law enforcement to keep Pride events safe and to be safe in their own persons at all times.

If the New Hanover County Sheriff’s Office chooses to support white nationalist terrorists instead of enforcing the law, then state and federal authorities need to step in fast and take action to stop the collusion and corruption.

************************

James Finn is a columnist for the LA Blade, a former Air Force intelligence analyst, an alumnus of Queer Nation and Act Up NY, and an “agented” but unpublished novelist. Send questions, comments, and story ideas to [email protected]

********************

The preceding article was previously published by Prism & Pen– Amplifying LGBTQ voices through the art of storytelling and is republished by permission.

Continue Reading

Commentary

Texas GOP calls to end gay marriage, criminalize adult Trans healthcare

“I have a hard time feeling sympathy for Log Cabin types knowing they support efforts to investigate parents of trans kids for ‘child abuse'”

Published

on

Texas Republican symbols from screenshots of Texas GOP website.

By James Finn | DETROIT – The Texas GOP isn’t just saying the quiet part out loud. They’ve ripped off their masks to leer, revealing something like a skull and crossbones to LGBTQ people and all Americans who value personal self determination.

Texas Republicans pledge to destroy basic human rights, family autonomy, and traditional American liberty. They even seem to have declared a theocracy, insisting that Christian religious belief must trump law, science, and medicine.

Here’s what’s going on.

The Texas Republican Party held its convention over the weekend, and they released a 40-page party platform late yesterday afternoon, voted on and approved by a majority of members. This morning’s headlines, as reported in The Hill, focus on a stunning guiding philosophy:

Homosexuality is an abnormal lifestyle choice. We believe there should be no granting of special legal entitlements or creation of special status for homosexual behavior, regardless of state of origin.

The Party clearly means what they say, having refused to allow the Log Cabin Republicans, a gay group, to participate on the floor of the state convention. While Log Cabin members profess to be “shocked,” much of the rest of the LGBTQ world asks why they’re surprised the Leopards Eating People’s Faces Party is actually eating their faces.

Beyond the odious abnormal lifestyle header, the devil is in the GOP’s “special legal entitlements” details

  • To the Texas GOP, the right to marry a same-sex partner is a special legal entitlement
  • The right for transgender adults to choose gender-affirming health care is also a special legal entitlement
  • The right (by implication) to have sex in private free from state criminal prosecution is a special legal entitlement
  • Choosing trans-affirming heath care for one’s own children is a special legal entitlement
  • Calling for parents to be criminally sanctioned for letting drag queens read stories to their children, the GOP demonstrates that parenting one’s own children is a special legal entitlement

Texas GOP wants to override overwhelming medical consensus opposing conversion therapy

The Texas Republican Party surprised exactly nobody when they claimed to know more than doctors about trans health care, but they didn’t stop there. They affirmed support for conversion therapy for transgender and gay people, a practice mental health and other medical professionals know (from almost a century of clinical experience) doesn’t work and causes severe mental health problems including suicide.

The GOP platform makes clear that science is irrelevant where it contradicts the Party’s view of conservative Christian beliefs and practices. They declare their intent to override the overwhelming consensus of medical licensing boards by forcing them to set aside evidence-based care standards.

Even the right to private sex is called into question

The platform doesn’t outright call for prosecuting gay people for having sex, but statements opposing honoring U.S. Supreme Court precedents, plus multiple references to “homosexual activity” as unacceptable, have obvious implications.

The Supreme Court struck down “sodomy” laws nationwide in 2003, telling states the U.S. Constitution grants people the right to the privacy of their own bedroom. But Texas Republicans have strongly disagreed every year since, refusing to strike down a state law that criminalizes “sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex.”

Apparently, sex is a “special legal entitlement” to Texas Republicans, who believe government should control even the most intimate, private details of Americans’ lives.

I encourage you to read the entire platform, because it’s an unabashed theocratic attack on American liberty, including calling for criminalizing abortion from the “moment of conception” with no exceptions. But if you don’t have time, here are two screenshot of some of the most egregious language.

Texas GOP calls for criminalizing trans health care and encouraging conversion therapy

Here, the Texas GOP say they intend to outlaw gender-affirming therapy for trans adults under 21. They also wish to prohibit professional licensing board from prohibiting conversion therapy. The language about “special legal status” means the Party opposes laws protecting LGBTQ people from discrimination.

Texas GOP call for ending same-sex marriage

Here, the Texas GOP calls marriage “God ordained” and calls for nullifying the Supreme Court decision that prevents them from banning same-sex marriage.

Let’s talk about the Log Cabin Republicans

If you’re tempted to feel sympathy for or solidary with the Log Cabin Republicans, let me tell you why that’s a bad idea. The Log Cabin crowd, who endorsed Donald Trump for president in 2020, oppose the proposed Equality Act that would protect LGBTQ Americans from discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodation. They support the right of religious people to refuse to provide goods or services to LGBTQ people. They speak up fiercely and regularly against transgender equality.

They are, in short, assimilationists who believe we LGBTQ people fuel our own persecution by not being “normal” enough. They just got taught a harsh lesson: they’re not normal either, despite their best efforts to appear so by throwing queer weirdos under the bus.

As former federal prosecutor, gay man, and USA Today columnist Michael J. Stern tweeted Saturday, “The LogCabinGOP are a bunch of self-hating gay men who support the “family values” party as a way of trying to wash some of their perceived homosexual stink from their souls.”

I agree with Stern, and I’ll add that I have an especially hard time feeling sympathy for the Log Cabin group knowing they spoke up to support Texas Republican efforts to investigate the parents of trans kids for “child abuse.”

Washing the “homosexual stink” from their souls apparently comes with a strong aversion for transgressing gender norms, and if any group in the U.S. is more hostile to trans equality than the Log Cabin bunch, I can’t think of one.

All Americans ought to be free to order their lives as they see fit

What’s the main takeaway from the Texas GOP platform? Texas Republicans want to run Americans’ private lives. They want to force medical decisions on children, parents, and adults. They want to dictate marriage based on their private religious beliefs. They want to dictate to doctors. They want to tell parents how to parent.

They insist on insinuating themselves, largely based on religion, into the most intimate areas of private life, areas Republicans once insisted government had no business meddling in.

Americans are already free to practice religion as they see fit, but yesterday, the Texas Republican Party released a 40-page document outlining how they intend to force their fellow Texans to follow the dictates of one particular religion, conservative Christianity — science, medicine, and differing faith traditions be damned.

That’s the big story here. No matter what political party you traditionally support, this blatant attack on American liberty should shock you.

Will you let this stand? Gay, straight, trans, or Republican, ask yourself this: what can you do to help stop this march toward Gilead?

************************

James Finn is a columnist for the LA Blade, a former Air Force intelligence analyst, an alumnus of Queer Nation and Act Up NY, and an “agented” but unpublished novelist. Send questions, comments, and story ideas to [email protected]

********************

The preceding article was previously published by Prism & Pen– Amplifying LGBTQ voices through the art of storytelling and is republished by permission.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Follow Us @LosAngelesBlade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts

Popular