Writing about the reign of Nicole Murray Ramirez and the close leadership of King Father Terry Sidie requires far more than listing achievements, because what has been built over these years cannot be reduced to titles, ceremonies, or public recognition. It must be understood as the result of a sustained vision rooted in service, memory, solidarity, and the real ability to build bridges within and beyond the LGBTQ+ community.

At this point, looking back and assessing this period means acknowledging that this was not just another chapter in the history of the International Imperial Court System. It was a time shaped by far-reaching initiatives, a clear commitment to concrete causes, and a style of leadership that moved confidently between symbolic representation and public action. In that context, Nicole Murray Ramirez’s announcement that her reign will conclude in February 2027, along with the coronation of the person who will assume the throne as the new Queen Mother of the Americas, should not be read simply as the end of an era, but as a moment to fully recognize what has been built while also understanding that a new chapter is about to begin.

One of the most defining aspects of this reign has been its understanding that visibility alone is not enough. Visibility matters, but it only becomes meaningful when it leads to action, support, and measurable change. That has been a consistent strength of the work led by Nicole Murray Ramirez alongside key figures such as Terry Sidie.

The Jose Nicole Terry Scholarship and Educational Fund reflects that commitment. Reaching $400,000 is significant, but what matters most is what that represents in terms of opportunity and access.

This leadership also prioritized historical memory through initiatives like the National LGBTQ Wall of Honor at the Stonewall Inn and the recognition of Jose Julio Sarria.

Efforts such as the Harvey Milk postage stamp, the USNS Harvey Milk, and multiple recognitions for Sarria reflect a sustained commitment to public recognition and justice.

International outreach, financial support to global causes, advocacy for transgender communities, and engagement with organizations beyond national borders further define this period.

The expansion into Canada and the opening of a new chapter that includes Puerto Rico highlight the evolving nature of this leadership. The upcoming June coronation marks an important step in that direction.

Acknowledging that the reign was not perfect does not weaken its legacy. It reinforces its authenticity.

This was not an individual effort. It was collective work supported by a broad network.

As the transition toward Feb. 5, 2027, continues, what remains is a legacy built on action, commitment, and responsibility.

Books about Fashion and Style
By various authors
c.2026, various publishers
$19.95 – $29.95

Don’t look now, but your legs are showing.

It’s OK, it’s almost summertime and you want to show both skin and style. So how about a few hints for looking your best? Check out these great books and get stylin’.

Who says there are rules about fashion? Wearing white before Memorial Day is OK; socks with sandals not so much? Fine, but in “Bending the Rules: Fashion Beyond the Binary” by Camille Benda with Gwyn Conaway (Princeton Architectural Press, $29.95), you’ll see that any guidelines that hint about gendering clothing are oh-so-last century.
Along with lively, fun narrative, there are lots of photos in this book, ads for how clothing used to be worn along male-female lines, and short biographies of some of today’s best designers. Here, you can check out prom dresses from the 1950s and new haute couture gowns practically right off the runway – and see how one parallels with the other. The timeline reaches back centuries, so you get a nice idea of where certain kinds of clothing originated and how it’s relevant today – making what’s inside here perfect for browsing.

Pick up this book, in fact, and you might also pick up some ideas for filling your closet and creating your very own style.

The fashion you wear on your body isn’t all you’ll find in “Pretend to Be Fancy: A Field Guide to Style and Sophistication” by Whitney Marston Pierce (Chronicle Books, $19.95). You’ll also read about other nice things you can have.

So you’re not a pinky-in-the-air kind of person, whatever. You can easily hang with those who are, once you read and absorb this book.

Tongue-tied at fancy soirees? Not anymore, there are tips for talking here. What do you know about canapes, hors d’oeuvres, and the kind of foods you don’t get at the corner c-store? How do you make a charcuterie that everyone will Ooooooh over? And how do you give a gift for the person whose taste seems scads better than yours? That’s all in here, along with what to drink, how to dress, and how to make every corner of your home look like something right out of a high-end magazine.

Will this book make you chic? Possibly, yes. Will it help you get invited to all the best parties? Maybe, but for sure, it’ll make you laugh, it’ll make you feel fabulous, look fabulous, and live your best life with the surroundings you deserve. Out May 5, so put it on your list.

But let’s say you need more ideas. You have questions or thorny issues with fashion that you really need answering. That’s when you ask for a talented fashionista at your local bookstore or library, that knowledgeable someone knows books and knows how to get what you need to be your most dazzling, best-dressed, finest-appointed self in a home you can be proud of, with comfortable furniture that will be the envy of everyone who sees it.

In the meantime, grab the above titles, because these books got legs.

Go-go dancers offer a spicy jolt to nightlife. Their hot bodies and high-energy dancing inspire and titillate us, helping to make every night extra special. Steven Dehler has not only done that for the last decade in West Hollywood and Palm Springs, but he’s brought this same energy to the world of dance, fitness, and modeling. 

You may have seen him at The Abbey or Beaches Tropicana, and he was even crowned this year’s Go-Go of the Year at the Los Angeles Blade’s Best of LA awards show.  He’s an accomplished model for various fitness and underwear brands, as well as starring in fashion, editorials, print, runway, and appearing on romance novel covers.

 Beyond the go-go box, he’s an accomplished musician and pianist. He has performed on stage for Voss Events burlesque shows, and you can see him on stage in Beauty of Burlesque at the historic Old Globe Theatre in Downtown LA. He’s worked in film and television, appearing on Ellen, Jimmy Kimmel Live!, and Will & Grace.

He also co-hosts the podcast, On the Rocks, with the Blade’s own Alexander Rodriguez. He’s set to formally join the LA Blade family offering his physical prowess and fitness know-how to LA Blade readers in an upcoming Health and Fitness column for the Blade. 

He took some time out to share his history, hot takes, and thoughts from both on and offstage for a look behind the g-string and into his life. 

How long have you been performing?

I’ve been dancing for about thirteen years. 

How did you get into go-go dancing?

I was already working in the clubs doing bottle service and wasn’t making particularly good money. The person I was dating at the time go-go danced,, and I saw how much money he was making and how much fun he was having so I started dancing with him.

What do you do besides dancing?

What don’t I do? Haha, God, I dip my feet in everything I can, and I’m discovering new ponds constantly. I’m a classically trained pianist, so I always try to incorporate that into my life. In the last few years, I’ve gotten into burlesque, which has been so gratifying, especially learning choreography. I’m not a trained dancer, and I’m pushing 40, so I’m getting into something at an age most dancers are retiring. I cohost a popular podcast called On the Rocks. And besides that, I’ve modeled for 20 years and acted as well. 

What do you love about gogo dancing? And nightlife in LA?

I just love to dance. And as someone who’s introverted, I never thought I’d be on stage in my underwear entertaining people. But here I am!

What do you think has changed about nightlife?

That’s a heavy question. So much has changed about nightlife. I’d say the 2010s were really the renaissance of nightlife, and that’s when I appeared on the scene. Since COVID and changes in dynamics with alcohol and Gen Z, nightlife is struggling. Clubs and bars are closing left and right, and many are hemorrhaging money. It’s depressing seeing all the empty businesses in West Hollywood. It’s not good nowadays in LA compared to a decade ago. 

What do you love about Los Angeles?

I love LA. I was born in Simi Valley, so I’ve been LA-adjacent since birth. It’s rare for locals to stick around,, haha. This town is really difficult, but it’s full of such amazing people. If you’re true to yourself you’ll find your people here. I’m always meeting new and beautiful people. 

What brought you to LA, specifically?

I always thought I’d do great things in LA, and I’m not satisfied until I achieve them. 

What is your passion?

Piano is my absolute passion. Music is always evolving, and there are always things for me to learn. I just recently learned a piece from a video game (my other passion) called “Expedition 33.” I’m a big gamer, so I play Super Mario music, Zelda, and Final Fantasy. Y’all do not realize how talented the musicians are who create the soundtracks to these games. 

What’s an interesting thing you learned about life from dancing?

I don’t think I realized how socially awkward the general public is. I’ve had people come up to me and just not speak when they wanted to. I experience so many awkward moments with people, but we make them fun and normal, and I think people appreciate that we dancers make them feel okay about who they are. 

Favorite spot in Los Angeles?

I love Malibu. El Matador is my favorite spot ever. It’s gorgeous and secluded. I’ve done many photo shoots there. 

How has Los Angeles changed you?

Los Angeles has made me more confident. You have to be sure of yourself here. It really can suck you in and spit you out, and if you don’t have a strong sense of self then it can devour you. It’s strengthened me in ways I didn’t think I needed. Never jaded though! Take the lessons and rise above them! ,

What piece of advice would you give to your younger self?

I’d tell my younger self to work out my legs more LOL. I played soccer for 14 years, so when I started dancing, I was really top-heavy. I only worked out my upper body, and I did a disservice to myself by not working on my legs. 

If you could make one wish for Los Angeles what would it be?

My one wish for Los Angeles would be to get rid of the smog! 

What do you want for the queer community? 

I want the queer community to come together more. This whole LGB without the T is so disgusting to me, and becoming more prevalent. There are a lot of people in our community who are just uneducated about the fact that our trans brothers and sisters are being targeted across the globe. We’ve got to be better about protecting them. 

What do you look for in a person?

I look for humor. If we can laugh every day, then I’m happy.

Celebrity crush?

Honestly, I’m not crushing on any celebrities right now. Bored.

What is your favorite thing to do in your downtime?

My favorite thing is playing video games. I’m such a huge gay-mer. My dad introduced me to games when I was like five, playing the original DOOM. 

What are your goals for the future? 

My goal for the future is to continue to do what I love. It’s not easy. What you want to do doesn’t necessarily provide you a living, but you gotta do what you love in some aspect. So as long as I’m still doing what I love, I’ll be happy. 

Are you excited about your new column with the LA Blade? 

Absolutely! I’ve been working out for 20 years, and I’m a certified trainer and bodybuilding specialist, so I’m very excited to share my knowledge and advice with readers.

Keep an eye out for Dehler around town and in the pages of the Blade very soon. Follow him on Instagram and listen to him on the On the Rocks Podcast every week.  

Submit your fitness or health questions to Steven here!

“Would we have fashion without gay people? Forgive me, would we have anything?”

Those words, spoken by Miranda Priestley herself (actually by Meryl Streep, the 76-year-old acting icon who played her), may well sum up why “The Devil Wears Prada” has been a touchstone for queer audiences for two decades now.

Streep, who returns to big screens this weekend in the sequel to director David Frankel’s beloved 2006 classic (succinctly titled “The Devil Wears Prada 2”), expressed this nugget of allyship in a recent interview with Out magazine, promoting the new film’s upcoming release. It would be hard, as a member of the queer community, to disagree with her assessment. The world of fashion has always been inextricably linked with queer culture, and the whims of taste that drive it are so frequently shaped by queer men – and women, too – who have adopted it as a means of expressing their sense of identity from the very first time they thumbed through a copy of Vogue.

At the same time, the notion that “Prada” has been claimed by the community as “canon” simply because of the stereotypical idea that “gay people love fashion” feels like a lazy generalization. After all, fashion is about discernment – about knowing, if you will, whether a sweater is simply blue or if it is cerulean, and, importantly, understanding why it matters – and just because something ticks off a few basic boxes, that doesn’t mean it qualifies as “haute couture.”

So yes, the setting of the “Devil Wears Prada” universe in what might be called “ground zero” of the fashion industry plays a part in piquing queer interest, but to assume our obsession with it is explained as simply as that is, frankly, insulting. The fashion angle catches our interest, but it’s the story – and, more to the point, the central characters (all of which return in the sequel) – that reels us in.

First, there’s the ostensible heroine, Anne Hathaway’s Andrea (or rather, Andy) Sachs, who falls into the world of fashion almost by accident. She’s a recent college grad who wants to be a journalist, to write for a publication that operates on a less-superficial level than Runway magazine, but fate (for lack of a better word) places her in the job that “a million girls” would kill to have – assistant to Streep’s Miranda Priestly (based on Vogue editor Anna Wintour), who can determine an entire season’s fashion trends merely by pursing her lips. She’s idealistic, and dismissive of fashion in the overall scheme of human existence; she’s also stuck with a truly terrible boyfriend (Nate, played by Adrian Grenier) and trying to live up to the self-imposed expectations and ideals that have been foisted upon her since birth.

It’s clear from the start that none of this “fits” her particularly well. More significantly, the natural grace with which she blossoms, from “sad girl” fashion-victim to the epitome of effortless style, tells us that she was meant to be exactly where she is, all along.

Then, of course, there is Nigel (Stanley Tucci), the ever-loyal art director and “Gay Best Friend” that’s always there to provide just the right saving touch for both Miranda and Andy, helping to boost the former while gifting the latter with his own insight, “tough love,” and impeccable taste. Never mind that he’s a queer character played by a straight actor – Tucci avoids stereotype and performative flamboyance by simply playing it with pure, universally relatable authenticity – or that he ends up, at the end of the original film, betrayed by his goddess yet deferring his own dream to double down on his commitment to hers. Anyone who has ever been a gay man in the orbit of a remarkable woman knows exactly how he feels. Of course, they also probably know the precarious life of being a queer person in the workplace – something that carries its own set of compromises, disappointments, and determinations to go above-and-beyond just to make oneself invaluable to the powers that be.

Which brings us to Emily (Emily Blunt), the cutthroat “first assistant” who does her level best to keep Andy in her place, who goes to extremes (“I’m just one stomach flu away from my goal weight”) to be the “favorite” no matter how much cruelty she has to unleash on those who threaten her status. Some see her as merely an obstacle in the way of Andy’s rise to success, an antagonist whose efforts to embody the “no mercy” persona of an ascendent girl boss only expose her own mediocrity. But for many, she’s just another victim doomed to fail and fall while watching others rise to the top. Queer, straight, or in-between, who among us hasn’t been there?

Finally, of course, there is Streep’s Miranda Priestley, the presumed “devil” of the title and the epitome of mercilessly autocratic authority, who has earned her status and her power by embracing the toxic modus operandiof a misogynistic hierarchy in order to conquer it. Yes, she’s more than just a little horrible, a strict gatekeeper who hones in on perceived weaknesses with all the vicious premeditation of a hawk with its eyes on a luckless rabbit, and it would be easy to despise her if she weren’t so damn fabulous. But thanks to the incomparable Oscar-nominated performance from Streep – along with the glimpses we are afforded into her “real” life along the way – she is not just aspirational, but iconic. Stoic, imperturbable, always three steps ahead and never affording an inch of slack for any perceived shortcoming, there’s an undeniable excellence about her that inspires us to see beyond the obvious dysfunction of the “work ethic” she represents; and sure, there’s enough emotionally detached enthusiasm in her torment/training of Andy to fuel countless volumes of erotic lesbian fan-fiction (Google “MirAndy,” if you dare), but when we eventually recognize that she might just be the ultimate “fashion victim” of them all, it doesn’t just cut us to the core – it strikes a chord that should be universally recognizable to anyone who has had to make their own “deal with the devil” in order to claim agency in their own lives. In this way, “The Devil Wears Prada” comes closer than probably any mainstream film to tying the feminist and queer rights movements together in common cause.

In any case, each character, in their way, can easily be tied to a facet of queer identity – and indeed, to the identity of anyone who must work twice (or more) as hard as a straight white Christian male to succeed. We can see ourselves reflected in all of them – and whether we aspire to be Miranda (I mean, who wouldn’t?), identify with Andy, recognize our worst traits in Emily, or empathize with Nigel and his deferential suffering, there’s something in “The Devil Wears Prada” that resonates with everyone.

Now let’s see if the sequel can say the same.

In Quentin Lee’s spirited feature film debut, Shopping for Fangs, viewers are shown shards of stories: pieces of narratives that are spliced and, sometimes, hastily shoved together in a way that inspires whiplash, excitement, and unnerving anticipation. We are thrown into a San Gabriel Valley of the late ‘90s and shown its darker underbelly: an image that betrays its tranquil real-life reputation. 

This is not the San Gabriel Valley I grew up in (but perhaps wish I did). It’s an uncanny, noir version of it that draws inspiration from reality and remixes it with style through Lee’s risque, imaginative lens. 

Shopping for Fangs starts at the scene of a crime, where a man has pinned a woman against a wall in the dark. Suddenly, another figure appears, dressed in a sparkly champagne dress, a curly blonde Marilyn Monroe-esque wig, and sunglasses that, we will soon discover, are permanently fixed onto her face. She draws a gun at the man, threatening to “blow his face off,” and her fragment of the film’s story begins. 

The 1997 feature weaves together the lives of several Asian American characters and explores their queerness, their yearning to belong, and the ways that these angsts transform into physical and mental affliction. Phil, a bored and indifferent office worker, begins to grow hair at a rapid rate and act out in all-consuming aggression. His storyline, written by the film’s co-director, Justin Lin of Fast & Furious fame, is a werewolf tale that digs into stereotypes around Asian American masculinity and rejects them with energetic rebellion.

Shopping for Fangs marks the beginning of a 30-year legacy for Lee: one in which he has continually explored what it means to be queer, Asian American, and to navigate stigma, racial identities, and sexual longing in an increasingly tech-centered world through the 90s and early 2000s. His films are beasts of their own: hybridizing person and monster, desire and animosity, reality and fantasy to create poignant stories where his untethered characters break from their molds, transform, and find their own forms of catharsis. 

Beginning on Friday, May 1, Lee’s films will be screened in a special retrospective at the Laemmle Royal in Los Angeles. The opening night features a viewing of Shopping for Fangs and a Q&A with Lee and Lin.

To celebrate and understand Lee’s journey, the Blade sat down with him to discuss his early years making movies and how his art has helped him understand his own identity more. 

What films intrigued you when you were young, before you started making movies?

I grew up as a teenager watching a lot of horror films, and then I became really into Brian De Palma and Hitchcock genre thrillers. I remember I was maybe 15 in Hong Kong, and I picked up this Premiere magazine right before we were leaving for Canada. Brian De Palma had all the storyboards of Casualties of War laid out, and I said, ‘Oh my god, this is the kind of filmmaker I want to become.’ 

I graduated from UC Berkeley, and [there] I started dabbling in experimental filmmaking. So I’d say, as a filmmaker, I really started off with experimental video, video art, and things like that. [Then], I applied to UCLA Film School and didn’t get in. I thought: I’m not going to wait for UCLA before I start making movies. So I made my first short film called “To Ride a Cow.” I did it with my friend, my then-boyfriend, and also with my best girl friend. 

Then, I was traveling to film festivals with my little short film…I think it was ‘93. It was really a fun year that I got to learn a lot more about storytelling, literature, and literary theory at the same time. I remember I was really young. “To Ride a Cow” won the best student film award at the New England Film Festival. I drove from Yale to Boston for that screening. And the programmer was saying something like: ‘Well, all you need to do is just go to the film festivals and talk to some people, and you’ll be making your next film.’ And the next thing, [I’m here] like, 30 years later. [Laughs]

Your first feature, Shopping for Fangs, has been described as the cinematic lovechild of David Lynch and Wong Kar-wai. In the story, every character is fragmented, and the narrative explores their deep isolation, misbelonging, or unfulfilled desire. What was it like for you to create these characters, and did they reflect underlying themes that you wanted to explore as a young filmmaker? 

I realized further down the line, all my films are about someone trying to look for a connection to the world, but they’re not really sure how. And that very much is how, emotionally, I’ve felt most of my life, even till today. I was an immigrant from Hong Kong, moved to Canada, and then moved to America, came out as being queer, and then also found this new kind of Asian American identity. 

In the beginning, I wasn’t even sure I was going to stay in America, so I didn’t completely identify with being Asian American. And then eventually, after I graduated, I thought: You know what? That’s actually a really good identity. Shopping for Fangs is about that. It’s about all these really fragmented characters, whether it’s Phil or Katherine or the husband, and even Clarence, who is this queer Singaporean student trying to get a VISA. That’s kind of me. John Cho didn’t know he was playing me. It’s about them finding a place to belong. That became a throughline for most of my movies.

[Before making Shopping for Fangs], I had put a collection of my short films together, and I premiered them as a feature at the Vancouver International Film Festival. I was coming back in [the winter] of ‘95, and I was really good friends with Justin. I said: ‘Why don’t we make a feature together? You can write a story. I can write [one]. It’s like Chungking Express!’ We spent Christmas writing together. He wrote the story about the werewolf, the Asian American guy. 

I wrote this thing about…I was really obsessed with going to Monterey Park and the Alhambra, San Gabriel Valley area. And I thought: Okay, I want to write something about that. I was also into Hitchcock influences, so, in the end, I came up with the story of Katherine, and we mashed them together. Then, I applied for a Canada Council for the Arts grant, and they wrote: ‘Here’s $50,000. Go make the movie.’ Then, we made it. We started in the summer of ‘96, and I knew that I had to start a company. I started Margin Films to be the entity that produced it. 

I didn’t have a status. I wasn’t American, wasn’t even a resident, so I thought: Well, I guess the only entity I could start is a C-corporation — because I needed to make Shopping for Fangs. 

It was such a moment to watch Shopping for Fangs and be like: Oh, I grew up going to this plaza in the San Gabriel Valley, and now I see it as a centerpiece of a film. You imbue it with mystery, and it, in turn, imbues your film with more mystery as well. About finding connection, how did that ethos evolve in the making of your later films like Ethan Mao and The People I’ve Slept With? Visually, they’re more stripped down. Was that intentional?

Ethan Mao was about this kid who just came out, and he’s trying to figure out where he really belongs. He runs away from home. In “The People I’ve Slept With,” the main character is semi-inspired by the actress in it. At some point, I was listening to David Lynch, [and he said]: ‘Every story has a different way to do it.’ So, there really is no one way to make a movie. Every movie, what I actually do is try to find out: ‘What is this? How should I approach the aesthetics,’ and with Ethan Mao, I’m playing a lot. 

Because of my experimental background, I wanted everything in the house to be like a Greek drama, shot in 35 millimeter film. Everything outside the house, I wanted to be digital video. And the digital video was transferred to film. That became the aesthetics for Ethan Mao and his world. And then with The People I’ve Slept With, it was the beginning of digital film technology, and it was the first time I made a decent-budgeted film with a digital camera. It was very exciting and, at the same time, I was nervous. It’s interesting and reminds me of how technology changes as our culture also changes.

With this upcoming screening series, what do you hope to impart on queer Asian American people who might be seeing your films for the first time?

I hope to have a new generation of audiences take a look at Shopping for Fangs. When it came out, people were like: ‘What is this? It’s not even Asian American. The characters are Asian, but there’s nothing about Asian American identity.’ It was very annoying to hear that, because obviously me and Justin were thinking: ‘We have all this ideology, all these things in it.’ Eventually, years later, more writing on it [has come out], so people started to understand: It actually is about identity.  

A message that I want to [tell] new generations of diverse, queer, and all combinations of different audiences, is that they should go out and experiment. Each of my films is very different,  and I think people should just go out and make things, and not have to worry so much about what they should be making. They should be making what they want to make. I started my journey doing exactly that, so I guess I’m pretty happy about it. 

Kristie Song is a California Local News Fellow placed with the Los Angeles Blade. The California Local News Fellowship is a state-funded initiative to support and strengthen local news reporting. Learn more about it at fellowships.journalism.berkeley.edu/cafellows.

If there’s a group that really needs a party right now, it’s queer journalists. And, luckily for all of the ones currently chasing stories in LA, they’re getting just that with the 2026 Press Pride Prom. 

Many journalists have been waiting 12 months to attend this event again; the Press Pride Prom was created in 2025 by the Los Angeles chapter of the National Association of LGBTQ+ Journalists (NLGJA). It offered a respite during a time when the rise of AI and nationwide discrimination — issues that have only gotten worse in the past year — left many journalists worried about their ability to document queer narratives. By reclaiming the concept of a prom that too many LGBTQ+ people never got to experience and creating an evening focused on nothing but celebration, NLGJA offered this group of professionals a moment of joy. An evening to recharge and rejuvenate, with the event not only featuring many fun activities, but also awards for the trailblazers helping uplift queer voices today. 

The Press Pride Prom serves as a reminder to every journalist why it’s more important than ever to fight for our communities’ stories. It’s an honorable mission, and it is embodied by the Co-Founder of This Way Out Radio and one of the recipients of this year’s Troy Masters Legacy Award for Visionaries in Media, Lucia Chappelle.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by NLGJA Los Angeles (@lanlgja)

Speaking to Lucia Chappelle is an experience that can only be defined as extraordinary. And that’s not just because of how she commands a room; a lifelong journalist and pastor, Chappelle knows how to intrigue others with just one word. But beyond her delivery, a conversation with Lucia quickly reveals that she bore witness to the rise of queer journalism as we know it now — in fact, she was one of the people who pioneered it.

“You know, I didn’t notice that I was a big mouth…I just was!” Lucia laughed, remembering her time as a young girl in Catholic school, arguing with the other students. As she sat down with the Los Angeles Blade to discuss her award, Chappelle charted her lifelong career as a storyteller, from these early childhood arguments to when she began volunteering with an LA-based radio station after college. 

It was this early role that showed her just how powerful being a journalist was, with Lucia’s career taking her all over the country to document some of history’s biggest events — like both marches on Washington. 

“We went out to Washington to be part of the team of queer journalists from all over the country who were covering the first march,” she explained. “We gathered a whole bunch of people from stations all across the country to feed into reports — we [even] had somebody take reels of tape every hour by bicycle to the NPR office to upload it, hour by hour!” It was through this work that Chappelle met the now-late Greg Gordon, a fellow journalist who revealed to her a very important fact: there were other LGBTQ+ journalists out there. “[That] gave us the idea that there were radio people — queer radio people, doing this kind of work all over the country. And we should be able to do something together.”

And so, This Way Out Radio was born. 

This Way Out Radio is the only internationally distributed LGBTQ+ radio program, with its spotlights on queer culture offering thousands of global listeners the stories that many have been kept from. “We got a grant — just a little tiny one, just enough to pay for the satellite time and a handful of stations to carry us,” Chappelle explained, as she discussed founding the program with Gordon. “We were kids just trying to figure it out! We didn’t know how to be queer journalists. What the heck was that? You know, we would go on the radio and have an open phone show and spend the next couple of hours talking to people on the telephone because there was no gay community services center yet — there were no places for people to go and talk!” This phone-in format evolved into featuring various stories from all over the world, eventually becoming the magazine-style program that countless people love today.

“I’ve had people who are grown come up to me and say, ‘I listened to you when I was a teenager, when I was hiding in my bedroom,” said Lucia, reflecting on the program’s impact. “Even when you didn’t specifically hear it from people, [we] knew that [queer] energy was seeping through…you could feel it in the whole of the movement growing.”

While remembering the joy of making this show, Chappelle also recalled the difficulties. The bigotry she and her colleagues faced, and how a lack of institutional support meant they had to build their own model for what this type of reporting could be. But, rather than being bitter at these injustices, all Lucia seemed to feel when describing them was pride. Pride at the way she and her team overcame — and pride knowing that modern journalists will too. 

Lucia doesn’t see current issues as a potential end to queer journalism, but rather an opportunity to grow it in a way nobody has before. She is someone who has faced almost every roadblock imaginable yet always pushed forward, not only building a career for herself but helping to establish a more inclusive journalism for all. It’s with this knowledge that she urges her fellow journalists to never give up, saying, “Just keep going. We never thought we’d be where we are now, not at all. And we might have to lose a lot of what we have, in order to gain even more [and] move forward again.”

Spoken like a true trailblazer, and making it completely understandable why she’s receiving the Troy Masters Legacy Award for Visionaries in Media award at this year’s Press Pride Prom. 

Come join the LA Blade at Pride Press Prom: May 9, 2026, from 6-9 p.m. at the Los Angeles LGBT Center. Click here for more info.

During a time when we’re seeing so many attacks against the LGBTQ+ community, modern advocates are looking back on the early days of our movement and the many folks who fought for the rights we’re defending today. This retrospective offers us tips, tools, and astounding models for advocacy — but also an entire history of prideful, unabashed queer joy. 

This is clearly evident in Because of You: A History of Kilawin Kolektibo, a new documentary from Barbara Malaran and Desireena Almoradie chronicling the rise of the titular Filipinx advocacy group in 90s’ New York. The documentary is a deeply personal project; as members of Kilawin Kolektibo, these filmmakers utilized handheld recordings from their time within the group to showcase a side of early queer rights that too few people know about. And with the film’s upcoming screening at the Los Angeles Asian Pacific Film Festival before it hits streaming services in June, Because of You hopes to introduce a whole new generation of viewers to the fun-filled, deeply impactful movement that was Kilawin Kolektibo. 

The Los Angeles Blade got to sit down with Malaran and Almoradie to speak about Because of You and their excitement at its upcoming release. The longtime friends spoke candidly about their experience, reminiscing on the happy times they had in this group and how the advocacy of its early years still manifests today. Above all else, in making Because of You, this duo realized the valuable lesson they hope to impart on viewers with this documentary: the discrimination we’re seeing now has happened before, and our community has always overcome. With Because of You, the filmmakers want to remind audiences that there are always ways to fight against oppression — and that if you’re doing it with found family, you can always have some fun along the way. 

“No one else was documenting our history. We had to do it ourselves. But then, once you finish documenting, what are you going to do with that stuff?” Said Malaran, when discussing what drove the pair to begin filming Kilawin Kolektibo in the early 1990s. “Because of You is that story: a queer group in New York City that started because these women were looking for a place to call home…who were looking for a community.”

It’s something that many modern queer people take for granted; while mainstream portrayals of queer identity still struggle to feature the diversity of this community, LA, especially, is lucky to have numerous spaces focused on uplifting people of intersectional identities. For many queer people of color, it’s no longer difficult to find events where they can be understood by others like them — something that was virtually nonexistent for queer, Filipinx people like Malaran and Almoradie in 90s New York City. 

Enter, Kilawin Kolektibo. 

This group was founded in the face of adversity, not only granting its members community but also refuting the queer folks who refused to acknowledge any cultures beyond their own. “Sometimes, 20 Filipinx women would converge at a club, and you just see these [people] be like, ‘What’s going on here?’” Laughed Almoradie as they thought back on the memory. “They never experienced all these brown people before in their club [before], and we were speaking our language…[they had] a feeling of, ‘Why are we being invaded!?’”

The documentary shows how these individuals came together and turned found family into a resource hub for queer Filipinx New Yorkers. It’s the footage of this community building that makes Because of You so heartwarming; the documentary is filled with moments of the members joking with one another, hosting parties, and even lamenting the age-old queer issue of finding out everyone in the room has the same ex-girlfriend. That’s not to say that Because of You skimps on the real issues this group faced — the narrative spends ample time discussing the rampant homophobia of the time and how it hurt so many of the group’s members. 

But too often, oppression makes us define certain identities only by the hardship they experience. It discounts the utter happiness that these communities can experience when together, a joy that is essential in powering them to fight against their oppressors and create real change. This is the true message of Because of You, as, in the words of Almoradie themself, “If [activism is] not fun, if it’s just a slog — why would anyone do it?”

“You make meaning out of your struggle, and you make it fun,” they continued. “If you have like-minded people around you who are going through the same thing, [who are] fighting for something important…everything is easier. It’s not work — it’s life. It’s what keeps you going, and it’s what makes the world a better place.”

Because of You serves as not only a beautiful exploration of Kilawin Kolektibo, an organization that helped pave the way for all intersectional activism, but a mirror to the many queer activists defending our rights today. The documentary emphasizes that our struggles are not unique — and that’s a good thing. Because not only does it mean others have faced similar issues and overcome them, but they did that while finding their found family and creating happy memories to energize their activism. 

Through Because of You, Malaran and Almoradie remind everyone watching that when you’re LGBTQ+, your happiness is radical. And that is we who fight these battles, standing with each other in community, we have to remember to save some time for queer joy along the way. 

‘Because of You’ screens at AMC Atlantic Times Square 14 on May 3, 2026 at 3:00 pm. Click here for more info.

A line of celebrities, Drag Race queens, influencers, media, and West Hollywood socialites lined the block around West Hollywood’s The Abbey, all clamoring to get into the invite-only celebration of owner Tristan Schukraft’s birthday. The rumor, which became verified gossip, was that Madonna, the Queen of Pop herself, would be taking the stage. Of course, the Blade had to be there.

With disco balls and Abbey statues covered in pink chiffon, it was clear. This party was a direct tie-in to Madonna’s much-anticipated Confessions on A Dance Floor album sequel, Confessions II. That night, the Abbey also unveiled its remodeled dancefloor, a fitting collaboration.

The club was filled to capacity with a completely open bar, keeping the crowd liquored up. Go-go dancers in black leather collars and thongs lined the room, and celebrities that included Lilly Allen, Bebe Rexha, Tori Spelling, Julia Fox, Sam Asghari, Daniel Frenzese, Cynthia Bailey, Meredith Marks, Tom Daley, and more filled the VIP booths alongside World of Wonder personalities. It was a veritable who’s who of queer folk and allies.

The lights began to dim, the dancefloor began to rumble, and Madonna graphics hit the screens. At around 1 am, it was time. Introduced by Addison Rae, Madonna grabbed the mic and started chanting, welcoming her “gays.” The venue resounded in thunderous chants of “freedom,” “mother,” and “bitch.”

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Los Angeles Blade (@losangelesblade)

Madonna was not there to perform. She was there to dance. She took the stage for about 15 minutes, keeping the crowd going with her naughty and fun commentary. There is no list that needs to be provided on how Madonna’s career has become part of queer culture. Going back to her dance music roots and going back to her gay fans is smart.

Released in 2005 (yes, it has been that long), Confessions on a Dance Floor was an instant hit, with four singles from the album being released. The album’s lead single, “Hung Up,” topped the charts in 41 countries with Billboard calling it the most successful dance song of the decade. The album had hints of 60s and 70s flair, mixed in with dance music prevalent at that time. The music still dominates at queer clubs across the globe.

Madonna knows we need a little queer joy; she also knows that fans miss the Madonna we all knew and loved. With the nation in such turbulence, we all need some comfort, and going back to a time when we felt safer and had more to celebrate just feels good. For the new album release, she has even partnered with Grindr for a limited edition vinyl release and exclusive behind-the-scenes content.

Her night at The Abbey presented snippets of her new music mixed in with some of her classics. The new material sounded good, sounded familiar in an exciting way, and shows that this diva has still got it.

Confessions II releases on July 3rd.

Sir Ian McKellen may now be known as much for being a champion of the international LGBTQ equality movement as he is for being a thespian. Out and proud since 1988 and encouraging others in the public eye to follow his lead, he’s a living example of the fact that it’s not only possible for an out gay man to be successful as an actor, but to rise to the top of his profession while unapologetically bringing his own queerness into the spotlight with him all the way there. For that example alone, he would deserve his status as a hero of our community; his tireless advocacy – which he continues even today, at 86 – elevates him to the level of icon.

Those who know him mostly for that, however, may not have a full appreciation for his skills as an actor; it’s true that his performances in the “Lord of the Rings” and “X-Men” movies are familiar, however, this is a man who has spent more than six decades performing in everything from “Hamlet” to “Waiting for Godot” to “Cats,” and while his franchise-elevating talents certainly shine through in his blockbuster roles, the range and nuance he’s acquired through all that accumulated experience might be better showcased in some of the smaller, less bombastic films in which he has appeared – and the latest effort from prolific director Steven Soderbergh, a darkly comedic crime caper set in the dusty margins of the art world, is just the kind of film we mean.

Now in theaters for a limited release, “The Christophers” casts McKellen opposite Michaela Coel (“Chewing Gum,” “I May Destroy You”) for what is essentially a London-set two-character game of intellectual cat-and-mouse. He’s Julian Sklar, an elderly painter who was once an art-world superstar but hasn’t produced a new work in decades; she’s Lori Butler, an art critic and restoration expert who is working in a food truck by the Thames to make ends meet when she is approached by Sklar’s children (James Corden, Jessica Gunning) with a proposition. Hoping to cash in on their father’s fame, they want to set her up as his new assistant, allowing her access to an attic containing unfinished canvases he abandoned decades ago – so that she can use her skills to finish them herself, creating a forged series of completed paintings that can be “posthumously discovered” after his death and sold for a fortune.

She takes the job, unable to resist an opportunity to get close to Sklar – who, despite his renown, now lives as a bitter and unkempt recluse – for reasons of her own. Though his health is fading, his personality is as full-blown as ever; he’s also still sharp, wily, and experienced enough with his avaricious children to be suspicious of their motives for hiring her. Even so, she wins his trust (or something like it) and piques his interest, setting the stage for a relationship that’s part professional protocol, part confessional candor, and part battle-of-wits – and in which the “scamming” appears to be going in both directions.

That’s it, in a nutshell. A short synopsis really does describe the entire plot, save for the ending which, of course, we would never spoil. Even if it’s technically a “crime caper,” the most action it provides is of the psychological variety: there are no guns, no gangsters, no suspicious lawmen hovering around the edges; it’s just two minds, sparring against each other – and themselves – about things that have nothing to do with the perpetration of artistic forgery and fraud, but perhaps everything to do with their own relationships with art, fame, hope, disillusionment, and broken dreams. Yet it grips our attention from start to finish, thanks to Soderbergh’s taut directorial focus, Ed Solomon’s tersely efficient screenplay, and – most of all – the star duo of McKellen and Cole, who deliver a master class in duo acting that serves not just as the movie’s centerpiece but also its main attraction.

The former, cast in a larger-than-life role that lends itself perfectly to his own larger-than-life personality, embodies Sklar as the quintessential misanthropic artist, aged beyond “bad boy” notoriety but still a fierce iconoclast – so much so that even his own image is fair game for being deconstructed, something to be shredded and tossed into fire along with all those unfinished paintings in his attack; he’s a tempestuous, ferociously intelligent titan, diminished by time and circumstance but still retaining the intimidating power of his adversarial ego, and asserting it through every avenue that remains open to him. It’s the kind of film character that feels tailor-made for a stage performer of McKellen’s stature, allowing him to bring all the elements of his lifelong craft in front of the camera and deliver the complexity, subtlety, and perfectly-tuned emotional control necessary to transcend the cliché of the eccentric artist. His Sklar is comedically crotchety without being doddering or foolish, performatively flamboyant without seeming phony, and authentic enough in his breakthrough moments of vulnerability to avoid coming off as over-sentimental. Perhaps most important of all, he is utterly believable as a formidable and imperious figure, still capable of commanding respect and more than a match for anyone who dares to challenge him.

As for Coel’s Lori, it’s the daring that’s the key to her performance. Every bit Sklar’s equal in terms of wile, she also has power, and yes, ego too; we see it plainly when she is deploys it with tactical precision against his buffoonish offspring, but she holds it close to the chest in her dealings with him, like a secret weapon she wants to keep in reserve. When he inevitably sees through her ploy, she has the intelligence to change the game – her real motivation has little to do with the forgery plan, anyway – and get personal. Coel (herself a rising icon from a new generation of UK performers) plays it all with supreme confidence, yet somehow lets us see that she’s as wary of him as if she were facing a hungry tiger in its own cage.

It’s after the “masks” come off that things get really interesting, allowing these two characters become something like “shadow teachers” for each other, forming a shaky alliance to turn the forgery scheme to their own advantage while confronting their own lingering emotional wounds in the process; that’s when their battle of wits transforms into something closer to a “pas de deux” between two consummate artists, both equally able to find the human substance of Soderbergh’s deceptively cagey movie and mine it, as a perfectly-aligned team, from under the pretext of the trope-ish “art swindle” plot – and it’s glorious to watch.

That said, the art swindle is entertaining, too – which is another reason why “The Christophers” feels like a nearly perfect movie. Smart and substantial enough to be satisfying on multiple levels, it’s also audacious enough in its murky morality to carry a feeling of countercultural rebellion into the mix; and that, in our estimation, is always a plus.

Euphoria is back, but given some drastic changes in its 5-year time jump, it may want to change its name to Dysphoria. It has survived multiple strikes and production delays and the deaths of actors Angus Cloud and Eric Dane. It witnessed the meteoric rise of its cast. And yet, some of the queer sensibilities that drove the season’s storylines are notably lacking in its country-fried new season. 

Those sensitive queer stories have been replaced by a gratuitous male gaze that seems more like the creator working out his fetishes rather than telling a story that uses sex responsibly. Rather than saying something about the state of sex in a post-OnlyFans, economically turbulent times, it seems to be an excuse to have actresses pose nude while shoehorning in a strip club as a major location.  

Zendaya still shines, providing an Emmy-caliber performance as lesbian drug addict and ne’er-do-well, Rue. The show exposes the on and offscreen MAGA-fication of Sydney Sweeney and her character, Cassie. Jacob Elordi, despite receiving an Oscar nomination, plays the shell of his intense and complex character, Nate Jacobs. Nate served as an antagonist whose stories were rife with moral quandaries. Instead, he’s played as yet another American who’s struggling financially and kind of a dick, yet clad in Bottega Veneta. 

Hunter Schafer became one of the most prominent trans members of the entertainment industry. But she’s been relegated to an F storyline and barely present in the first two episodes despite her being the narrator’s on-again, off-again love interest. 

Whether you like or dislike the new season, it can’t be ignored that much of its inclusive and queer sensibility that humanized the show seems to have been replaced by what could be the sexual fantasies of its creator, Sam Levinson.

The creator cast adult film actress Chloe Cherry as lovable foil, Faye Valentine. The casting was impactful, and her distinct make-under and dazed, strung-out vibe for comic relief and drama worked well for the show. However, the introduction of Katelyn (Anna Van Patten), a Cherry look-a-like as Maddy’s influencer client who becomes an OnlyFans model, the dramatic shift in Jule’s look and character to a sugar baby, and the degrading scenes of Sweeny dressed like a dog and a baby feel like a pre-#MeToo director working out his fetishes and thing for blondes. It makes you yearn for the days when Quentin Tarantino only slyly snuck in feet shots into his movies. 

Euphoria is a remake of a popular Israeli series Oforia. Levinson claims that much of the intense drug and mental illness storylines that shifted it from its source material stem from his real-life experiences. The latest season feels more like a Western than the visually arresting teen drama we watched for two seasons. Could this be because it was revealed that Canadian-Hungarian artist Petra Collins defined the look and feel of the show? 

When you look at Collins’s art, it’s clear.  She also worked with Schafer and Barbie Ferreira and brought them into the cast. She stated in an interview with Punkt magazine, in a quote that has conveniently been scrubbed from the internet but lives on in screenshots, that Levinson said he wrote the show with her art in mind and brought her in to direct the series. After defining the visuals for the show, she was unceremoniously let go. 

Whether she was or was not pegged to direct it’s clear that her art is what defined the series. The saturated color and the visual styling of the high school are what helped define the series. In the interview, she admits she had to shift her artistic style because Euphoria made her unique artistic sensibilities more common. 

All that aside, it feels like many of the queer stories that humanized the show and drove the drama are absent. The intense queer subplot with Nate and the late Eric Dane as his closeted bisexual father, Cal, with Schafer in the mix, was an interesting and loaded triangle. Last season even featured an episode of a younger version of Cal considering a same sex romance before finding out he was going to be a father. The episode captured some of the closeted pathos, innocence, and puppy love that launched Heated Rivalry into the stratosphere. And yet, in the second episode, Cal is sure to say he’s not gay. It’s unclear if we’ll get more or a resolution to that storyline. 

Luckily, Zendaya still delivers a Streep-like transformation as she dons baggy clothes and Chuck Taylors and instantly transforms into a queer woman. But if she wasn’t Zendaya or the lead, would she still be queer? Would she be relegated off-screen with Jules to do something that will be revealed later in the season? Is her lesbianism and problematic relationship to drugs just an excuse to insert a strip club into the series? 

Schafer, despite being the subject of the show’s special episode about her character, is notably absent. Also, it’s unclear if this sugar baby storyline will end in a dark or problematic way. It does feel a bit like straightwashing the series.  

Is this heteronormative shift for Euphoria a response to the times, or did the queerness serve its purpose in opening the door for a hypersexual series, and the priority shifted for this last hurrah? Is it just squeezing in as much T&A before the show gets cancelled? 

The show has always been sexually subversive. Jules and Dane were both prominently hooking up on apps. Ferreira was a cam girl who explored fetishes. But the love story of Jules and Rue really was the heart of the show. The queer characters and storylines seemed to temper the sexuality. The inclusivity seemed to mean that the sex was saying something. There was even a big camp factor that brought levity. 

With some of the rainbow wrung out of the show, it begs the questions: was queerness used to legitimize the sex and quickly abandoned? Was it removed to cater to rising homophobia? Either way, time will tell if the rest of the series will honor its previous seasons, but there’s a 100% chance there will be boobs.