The court ruled the state has a compelling interest “in protecting the physical and psychological well-being of minors, including LGBTQ youth.
Tanner Cross stated it was against his beliefs to “affirm that a biological boy can be a girl and vice versa”
In the 2-1 ruling, the court said Colorado had a compelling interest in protecting the “dignity interests” of members of marginalized groups.
Anti-LGBTQ Alliance Defending Freedom represents Tanner Cross
ACLU is planning lawsuit to block enforcement of state law
Legislation seen as alternative to Equality Act
Supreme Court hearing 3 employment discrimination cases on Oct. 8
Decision may not come until June 2020
Christian right links parents’ right to fix child victim of sex abuse
DOJ joins FRC for task force defending “religious liberties”